Modern Theory Of Democracy

Illustration of a traditional assembly discussing governance, symbolizing on-chain democracy and decentralized blockchain governance.
  • Building a Transparent Tomorrow: On-Chain Governance Inspired by Ancient Democratic Values.
  • Building a Transparent Tomorrow on the Foundations of the Past.
Join Investor-friendly Blockchain Platform Grants
Join Investor-friendly Blockchain Platform News Channel on Telegram

Origins and Definition of Democracy

In the annals of human history, the quest for a genuine democratic system, often considered the 'holy grail' of societal governance, has remained elusive in practice.

First, consider the very etymology of the word 'Democracy.' Derived from ancient Greek, 'Dēmokratía' breaks down into "Dêmos," meaning "People," and "Kratos," which translates as "Power."

Democracy, thus, literally signifies "power to the people."

Wikipedia describes Democracy as a system of government in which state power is vested in the people, the population. Yet, in contemporary democratic models, a critical distinction arises: people elect representatives rather than voting directly on matters that affect their lives. They entrust a select few with the authority to make decisions on their behalf, effectively handing over a blank check.

History reveals a constant: power, when concentrated, often tends to centralize further. Consequently, in many so-called ‘democratic’ systems, the voice and choice of individuals get overshadowed, leading to hyper-centralized governance where the collective voice becomes weaker. This is where the fusion of true democratic values and new blockchain technology can effectively solves these challenges.

Democracy Through Technology

Blockchain technology provides a strong foundation for rethinking democratic governance. Although 13 years have passed since the inception of Bitcoin, the vision of an on-chain democracy remains unrealized, today a few entities are controlling many of the leading blockchains.

Fushuma aspires to change that narrative. By proposing a vision of a decentralized voting system and combining it with a transparent treasury, we aim to create a true on-chain democracy where power belongs to the “Dêmos.”

“At each stage of human existence, the adult man is off on his quest of his holy grail, the way of life he seeks by which to live.” Clare W.Graves

Fushuma: A Decentralized Platform for Democratic Governance

I. Decentralized From Day 1

FUMA's token distribution illustrates Fushuma's commitment to decentralization.

With 40% allocated to the on-chain treasury, governed by the community, and 24% leveraging Callisto Network's Proof-of-Work distribution model, Fushuma inherits a widely distributed base. Additionally, 6% is allocated for airdrops to engage the broader crypto-community.

This balanced strategy prevents excessive concentration of control, aligning with Fushuma's commitment to decentralization.

II. Fushuma's Treasury

To make unique network feature allowing for grants, avoiding traditional centralization, and promoting further decentralization.

Indeed, on-chain democracy relies on individuals’ active involvement in the decision-making process. Similarly, the Web 3.0 digital era should be characterized by users’ active and decentralized participation, thereby ensuring an equitable digital future for all.

A unique network feature allowing for grants, avoiding traditional centralization, and promoting further decentralization.

Objectives of Fushuma On-Chain Democracy

With a vision to empower the community and give them full control over the network’s direction, Fushuma On-Chain Democracy’s core goals are:

  • Overseeing the implementation of upgrades.
  • Facilitating the adoption of new consensus.

  • Allocating funds from the Fushuma Treasury.

Fushuma’s vision is to create an environment where every network participant’s voice has an impact on the decision-making process. While we believe in complete decision-making rights, we also recognize the need for strong checks and balances. These measures ensure that no majority can unilaterally impact the network’s health or exploit the Fushuma Treasury unfairly.

Proposal Submissions: Enhancing On-Chain Democracy and Governance

Through the Fushuma Improvement Proposals (FIP), all community members are invited to actively participate in the network’s life, thereby creating a sense of shared ownership within the framework of on-chain democracy. Therefore, this approach improves blockchain democracy by ensuring clear and decentralized governance.

Notably, each proposal submission to Fushuma will require a nominal fee of $20. This fee balances accessibility for proposers and the need to maintain the integrity of the governance process.

Then, the collected fees will be transfered to the Fushuma Treasury, thereby helping the network’s growth and sustainability.

Fushuma On-Chain Governance Mechanism

  • Proposal Submission Process

    Community members are encouraged to submit well-reasoned proposals through a dedicated platform. Each proposal should clearly state its intention, the expected results, and the expected funding.

  • Dynamic Thresholds for On-Chain Proposal Consideration

    A dynamic upvote threshold ensures that only pertinent proposals advance. Specifically, a proposal threshold will be determined based on the proposal’s value. (Small feature grant requires less voting threshold than a larger project grant).

  • Incentiving Participation in Blockchain Democracy

    To further promote an environment of active governance, participants will be eligible for bonuses and rewards.

  • Resolving Rejections

    If a proposal does not get enough votes, the author can revise it. In these cases, authors must clearly address previously raised concerns and describe the changes they made in the re-submitted proposals.

  • Protection Against Malfeasance

    The community can collectively flag suspicious or harmful activities, reinforcing the principles of on-chain governance. Specifically, if more than 1/3 of the previous voting session’s active participants flag an issue, then a community-wide vote on the ostracism process will be triggered.

  • Ostracism Process and Sanctions

    • If a majority votes for ostracism, the flagged entity will face sanctions.

    • Furthermore, an appeal mechanism ensure fairness and allow for contestation of the decision.

Promoting Active Participation with Sortition

To further decentralize the voting power and include more community members, Ambassador rights will be awarded to active community members, enhancing the practical application of blockchain democracy. In particular, this mechanism is directly inspired by Athenian democracy, where citizens had an equal chance to hold public office, reducing the risks of corruption and elite domination in governance. Thus, the sortition process reinforces on-chain democracy's ideals.

Implementation and Review

This integrated rewards system will be initially introduced as a pilot program, with ongoing monitoring and evaluation to determine how effectively it enhances democratic participation.

Based on community feedback and collected data, adjustments will be made to ensure fairness and the network’s health.

Implementation Phases

• Phase 1: Initial management by Fushuma founders, Founding partners, and VCs.

• Phase 2: Full treasury control transitions to the community, realizing our vision for a decentralized democratic ecosystem.

SHARE THIS PUBLICATION ANYWHERE YOU LIKE

SHARE THIS STORY ANYWHERE

More NEWS

  • Exponential Bonding Curve for Treasury Management

Blockchain Funding and Need for Innovation

|Community Articles|

Traditional funding methods like ICOs often suffer from centralization and market volatility. This article introduces Exponential Bonding Curves, designed to promote sustainable and equitable investment, enhance market stability, and uphold the true decentralized spirit of blockchain projects.

Go to Top